Monthly Archives: February 2017

//February

Family Law Case Law CESARE v. CESARE- Supreme Court of New Jersey

713 A.2d 390 (1998)154 N.J. 394Kathleen CESARE, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Richard CESARE, Defendant-Respondent.Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued March 16, 1998.Decided June 3, 1998. Laura K. Abel, Newark, for plaintiff appellant (Crummy, Del Deo, Dolan, Griffinger & Vecchione, attorneys; Ms. Abel and Lawrence S. Lustberg, on the brief).Dorothy L. Wright, Green Brook, for defendant-respondent (Ms. Wright, attorney; Donald W. [...]

By | February 28th, 2017|Family Law, New Jersey|0 Comments

Family Law Case Law LEHR v. ROBERTSON et al.- Supreme Court of United States

463 U.S. 248 (1983)LEHRv.ROBERTSON ET AL.No. 81-1756.Supreme Court of United States.Argued December 7, 1982Decided June 27, 1983APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK David J. Freeman argued the cause and filed briefs for appellant.Jay L. Samoff argued the cause for appellees and filed a brief for appellees Robertson et al. Robert Abrams, Attorney [...]

By | February 28th, 2017|Family Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Family Law Case Law PARHAM, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES OF GEORGIA, ET AL. v. J. R. ET AL.- Supreme Court of United States

442 U.S. 584 (1979)PARHAM, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES OF GEORGIA, ET AL.v.J. R. ET AL.No. 75-1690.Supreme Court of United States.Argued December 6, 1977.Reargued October 10, 1978.Decided June 20, 1979.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. R. Douglas Lackey, Assistant Attorney General of Georgia, reargued the cause for appellants. [...]

By | February 28th, 2017|Family Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Taxes & estate planning Case Law EL. NOBLE et al. v. A. BRUCE, Jr. W. FAUNTLEROY, Jr. et al. v. N. BLIZZARD, Personal Representative et al.- Court of Appeals of Maryland

709 A.2d 1264 (1998)349 Md. 730Aileen L. NOBLE et al.v.Charles A. BRUCE, Jr.Thomas W. FAUNTLEROY, Jr. et al.v.Sara N. BLIZZARD, Personal Representative et al.Nos. 7, 55, Sept. Term, 1997.Court of Appeals of Maryland.May 21, 1998.15 Stanard T. Klinefelter (Shale D. Stiller, Kurt J. Fischer, Marta D. Harting, Piper & 16 Marbury, L.L.P., Baltimore; William G. [...]

By | February 27th, 2017|Maryland, Taxes & estate planning|0 Comments

Taxes & estate planning Case Law ESTATE OF ALBERT STRANGI, DECEASED, ROSALIE GULIG, INDEPENDENT EXECUTRIX v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE – Tax Court of United States

115 T.C. 478 (2000)ESTATE OF ALBERT STRANGI, DECEASED, ROSALIE GULIG, INDEPENDENT EXECUTRIX, PETITIONERv.COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENTDocket No. 4102-99.United States Tax Court.Filed November 30, 2000.Norman A. Lofgren and G. Tomas Rhodus, for petitioner.Deborah H. Delgado, Gerald L. Brantley, Sheila R. Pattison, and William C. Sabin, Jr., for respondent.COHEN, Judge:On December 1, 1998, respondent determined a [...]

By | February 27th, 2017|Taxes & estate planning, USA Tax Court|0 Comments

Taxes & estate planning Case Law ROBERT LUCAS et al. v. L. S. HAMM – Supreme Court of California

56 Cal.2d 583 (1961)ROBERT LUCAS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,v.L. S. HAMM, Defendant and Respondent.S. F. No. 20269.Supreme Court of California. In Bank.Sept. 5, 1961.Reginald G. Hearn for Plaintiffs and Appellants.Philip H. Angell, Scott Elder, Robert M. Adams, Jr., Angell, Adams, Gochnauer & Elder and B. E. Kragen for Defendant and Respondent.GIBSON, C. J.Plaintiffs, who [...]

By | February 27th, 2017|California, Taxes & estate planning|0 Comments

Taxes & estate planning Case Law UNITED STATES v. BYRUM, EXECUTRIX – Supreme Court of United States

408 U.S. 125 (1972)UNITED STATESv.BYRUM, EXECUTRIX.No. 71-308.Supreme Court of United States.Argued March 1, 1972.Decided June 26, 1972.CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Matthew J. Zinn argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Crampton, Loring W. Post, and [...]

By | February 27th, 2017|Taxes & estate planning, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Taxes & estate planning Case Law UNITED STATES v. CARLTON – Supreme Court of United States

512 U.S. 26 (1994)UNITED STATESv.CARLTONNo. 92-1941.United States Supreme Court.Argued February 28, 1994.Decided June 13, 1994.CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Blackmun, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, and Ginsburg, JJ., joined. O'Connor, J., filed an opinion concurring in the [...]

By | February 27th, 2017|Taxes & estate planning, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Taxes & estate planning Case Law GREGORY v. HELVERING, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE – Supreme Court of United States

293 U.S. 465 (1935)GREGORYv.HELVERING, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.No. 127.Supreme Court of United States.Argued December 4, 5, 1934.Decided January 7, 1935.CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Mr. Hugh Satterlee, with whom Messrs. George W. Saam, Rollin Browne, and Charles A. Roberts were on the brief, for petitioner.Solicitor General Biggs, with whom [...]

By | February 27th, 2017|Taxes & estate planning, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Taxes & estate planning Case Law Kristin Terk BELT and Kimberly Terk Murphy, Joint Independent Executrixes of the Estate of David B. Terk, Deceased v. OPPENHEIMER, BLEND, HARRISON & TATE, INC., Glen A. Yale, J. David Oppenheimer and Kenneth M. Gindy – Supreme Court of Texas

192 S.W.3d 780 (2006)Kristin Terk BELT and Kimberly Terk Murphy, Joint Independent Executrixes of the Estate of David B. Terk, Deceased, Petitioners,v.OPPENHEIMER, BLEND, HARRISON & TATE, INC., Glen A. Yale, J. David Oppenheimer and Kenneth M. Gindy, Respondents.No. 04-0681.Supreme Court of Texas.Argued September 29, 2005.Decided May 5, 2006.Rehearing Denied June 30, 2006. Barry Snell, Bayne [...]

By | February 27th, 2017|Taxes & estate planning, Texas|0 Comments