Monthly Archives: February 2017

//February

Divorce Case Law MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION v. DIVORCE ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION – Supreme Court of Minnesota

248 N.W.2d 733 (1976)MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, Respondent,v.DIVORCE ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION, INC., Defendant,Richard F. Doyle, Appellant.No. 45539.Supreme Court of Minnesota.December 17, 1976. Arthur, Chapman, McDonough & Michaelson and Lindsay G. Arthur, Jr., Minneapolis, Thomas J. Burke, St. Paul, for appellant.Collins & Buckley, Theodore J. Collins, and Morley Friedman, St. Paul, for respondent.Randall D. B. Tigue and [...]

By | February 27th, 2017|Divorce, Minnesota|0 Comments

Divorce Case Law BERRY v. BERRY – Supreme Court of Texas

647 S.W.2d 945 (1983)Giles Coulter BERRY, Petitioner,v.Elna Hettie BERRY, Respondent.No. C-1572.Supreme Court of Texas.March 9, 1983.Ernest T. Foree, Dallas, for petitioner.Dave Haigler, Dallas, for respondent.KILGARLIN, Justice.The sole question presented for consideration is the value of Elna Berry's interest in the retirement benefits of her ex-husband, Giles Berry. The judgment of the trial court awarded Mrs. [...]

By | February 27th, 2017|Divorce, Texas|0 Comments

Divorce Case Law MURFF v. MURFF – Supreme Court of Texas

615 S.W.2d 696 (1981)Wanda Faye MURFF, Petitioner,v.John Samuel MURFF, Respondent.No. B-9635.Supreme Court of Texas, Dallas County.April 29, 1981.Rehearing Denied June 10, 1981. Dennis G. Brewer, Inc., Vincent R. Kirst, Irving, for petitioner.Saner, Jack, Sallinger & Nichols, Robert L. Dillard, III and Robert E. Hager, Dallas, for respondent.SPEARS, Justice.In this divorce case, petitioner, Wanda Faye Murff, [...]

By | February 27th, 2017|Divorce, Texas|0 Comments

Divorce Case Law DAISY M. DE BURGH v. ALBERT RAYMOND DE BURGH – Supreme Court of California

39 Cal.2d 858 (1952)250 P.2d 598DAISY M. DE BURGH, Appellant,v.ALBERT RAYMOND DE BURGH, Respondent.Docket No. L.A. 21986.Supreme Court of California. In Bank.November 25, 1952. Max Fink, Jerry Rolston, Cyrus Levinthal and Leon E. Kent for Appellant.Donald Armstrong for Respondent.TRAYNOR, J.Plaintiff Daisy M. De Burgh and defendant Albert Raymond De Burgh were married in California in [...]

By | February 27th, 2017|California, Divorce|0 Comments

Divorce Case Law HISQUIERDO v. HISQUIERDO – Supreme Court of United States

439 U.S. 572 (1979)HISQUIERDOv.HISQUIERDO.No. 77-533.Supreme Court of United States.Argued November 1, 1978.Decided January 22, 1979.CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. James D. Endman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.Howard M. Fields argued the cause pro hac vice for respondent. On the brief was Ray C. Bennett.Elinor H. Stillman argued the cause [...]

By | February 27th, 2017|Divorce, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Employment Law Case Law NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. et al. v. DARDEN- Supreme Court of United States

503 U.S. 318 (1992)NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. et al.v.DARDENNo. 90-1802.United States Supreme Court.Argued January 21, 1992.Decided March 24, 1992.CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT Souter, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.George Robinson Ragsdale argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Gordon E. McCutchan, [...]

By | February 27th, 2017|Employment Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Employment Law Case Law CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT v. BREEDEN- Supreme Court of United States

532 U.S. 268 (2001)CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTv.BREEDENNo. 00-866.United States Supreme Court.Decided April 23, 2001.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Per Curiam.Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 255, as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 2000e—3(a), it is unlawful [...]

By | February 27th, 2017|Employment Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Employment Law Case Law SKREMER v. CHEMICAL CONSTRUCTION CORP.- Supreme Court of United States

456 U.S. 461 (1982)KREMERv.CHEMICAL CONSTRUCTION CORP.No. 80-6045.Supreme Court of United States.Argued December 7, 1981.Decided May 17, 1982.CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. David A. Barrett argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr.Robert Layton argued the cause and filed a brief [...]

By | February 27th, 2017|Employment Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Divorce Case Law VANDERBILT v. VANDERBILT ET AL. – Supreme Court of United States

354 U.S. 416 (1957)VANDERBILTv.VANDERBILT ET AL.No. 302.Supreme Court of United States.Argued April 22-23, 1957.Decided June 24, 1957.CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK AND SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF NEW YORK.Sol A. Rosenblatt argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Charles Roden.Monroe J. Winsten argued the cause [...]

By | February 27th, 2017|Divorce, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Employment Law Case Law SHAW, ACTING COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, ET AL. v. DELTA AIR LINES, INC., ET AL.- Supreme Court of United States

463 U.S. 85 (1983)SHAW, ACTING COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, ET AL.v.DELTA AIR LINES, INC., ET AL.No. 81-1578.Supreme Court of United States.Argued January 10, 1983.Decided June 24, 1983.[*]APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Deborah Bachrach, Assistant Attorney General of New York, argued the cause for appellants. [...]

By | February 27th, 2017|Employment Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments