Business

/Business

Business Case Law EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. SOUTHERN PHOTO MATERIALS COMPANY – Supreme Court of United States

273 U.S. 359 (1927)EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY OF NEW YORKv.SOUTHERN PHOTO MATERIALS COMPANY.No. 6.Supreme Court of United States.Argued November 19, 1925.Decided February 21, 1927.ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. Mr. John W. Davis, with whom Messrs. Frank L. Crawford and Clarence P. Moser were on the brief, for plaintiff in error.Mr. [...]

By | March 16th, 2017|Business, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Business Case Law UNITED STATES v. SCOPHONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA et al. – Supreme Court of United States

333 U.S. 795 (1948)UNITED STATESv.SCOPHONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA ET AL.No. 41.Supreme Court of United States.Argued January 12-13, 1948.Decided April 26, 1948.APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Sigmund Timberg argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant [...]

By | March 16th, 2017|Business, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Business Case Law PEREIRA et al. v. UNITED STATES – Supreme Court of United States

347 U.S. 1 (1954)PEREIRA ET AL.v.UNITED STATES.No. 50.Supreme Court of United States.Argued October 20, 1953.Decided February 1, 1954.CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. Charles L. Sylvester argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was William H. Fryer.John R. Wilkins argued the cause for the United States. [...]

By | March 16th, 2017|Business, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Business Case Law MARSHALL, SECRETARY OF LABOR, et al. v. BARLOW’S, INC. – Supreme Court of United States

436 U.S. 307 (1978)MARSHALL, SECRETARY OF LABOR, ET AL.v.BARLOW'S, INC.No. 76-1143.Supreme Court of the United States.Argued January 9, 1978.Decided May 23, 1978.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO Solicitor General McCree argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Deputy Solicitor General Wallace, Stuart A. Smith, and [...]

By | March 16th, 2017|Business, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Business Case Law CITY OF ST. LOUIS v. PRAPROTNIK – Supreme Court of United States

485 U.S. 112 (1988)CITY OF ST. LOUISv.PRAPROTNIKNo. 86-772.Supreme Court of United States.Argued October 7, 1987Decided March 2, 1988CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT James J. Wilson argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Julian L. Bush.Charles R. Oldham argued the cause for respondent. With him [...]

By | March 16th, 2017|Business, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Business Case Law MOBIL OIL CORP. v. COMMISSIONER OF TAXES OF VERMONT – Supreme Court of United States

445 U.S. 425 (1980)MOBIL OIL CORP.v.COMMISSIONER OF TAXES OF VERMONT.No. 78-1201.Supreme Court of United States.Argued November 7, 1979.Decided March 19, 1980.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF VERMONT. Jerome R. Hellerstein argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were John Dwight Evans, Jr., and William B. Randolph.Richard Johnston King argued the cause for [...]

By | March 16th, 2017|Business, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Business Case Law ILLINOIS v. WARDLOW – Supreme Court of United States

528 U.S. 119 (2000)ILLINOISv.WARDLOWNo. 98-1036.United States Supreme Court.Argued November 2, 1999.Decided January 12, 2000.CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS Rehnquist, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas, JJ., joined. Stevens, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Souter, Ginsburg, and [...]

By | March 16th, 2017|Business, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Business Case Law BEST VAN LINES, INC v. Tim WALKER – United States Court of Appeals

490 F.3d 239 (2007)BEST VAN LINES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Tim WALKER, Defendant-Appellee.Docket No. 04-3924-cv.United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.Argued: April 27, 2006.Decided: June 26, 2007.Tim Walker, Waverly, IA, Defendant-Appellee, pro se.Thomas Freedman (Terrence A. Oved, Darren Oved, Eric S. Crusius, on the brief), Oved & Oved, New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellant.Slade R. Metcalf (Katherine M. Bolger, [...]

By | February 10th, 2017|Business, Case Law, United States Court of Appeals|0 Comments

Business Case Law Joseph E. DISTER v. The CONTINENTAL GROUP, INC – United States Court of Appeals

859 F.2d 1108 (1988)Joseph E. DISTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.The CONTINENTAL GROUP, INC., Defendant-Appellee.No. 876, Docket 87-7995.United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.Argued March 21, 1988.Decided October 3, 1988.Joseph D. Garrison, New Haven, Conn. (Garrison, Kahn, Silbert & Arterton, New Haven, Conn., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.William C. Bruce, New Haven, Conn., for defendant-appellee.Before FEINBERG, Chief Judge, and CARDAMONE [...]

By | February 10th, 2017|Business, Case Law, United States Court of Appeals|0 Comments

Business Case Law UNITED STATES v. Efrain SANTOS – Supreme Court of United States

128 S.Ct. 2020 (2008)UNITED STATES, Petitioner,v.Efrain SANTOS and Benedicto Diaz.No. 06-1005.Supreme Court of United States.Argued October 3, 2007.Decided June 2, 2008.Matthew D. Roberts, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.Todd G. Vare, Indianapolis, IN, for respondents.Paul D. Clement, Solicitor General, Counsel of Record, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., Alice S. Fisher, Assistant Attorney General, Michael R. Dreeben, Deputy [...]

By | February 10th, 2017|Business, Case Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments