Business

/Business

Business Case Law WILLIAMSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA v. LEE OPTICAL OF OKLAHOMA – Supreme Court of United States

348 U.S. 483 (1955)WILLIAMSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA, ET AL.v.LEE OPTICAL OF OKLAHOMA, INC. ET AL.No. 184.Supreme Court of United States.Argued March 2, 1955.Decided March 28, 1955.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA.[*]James C. Harkin, Assistant Attorney General of Oklahoma, argued the cause for appellants in No. 184 and [...]

By | February 10th, 2017|Business, Case Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Business Case Law LITTON FINANCIAL PRINTING DIVISION, A DIVISION OF LITTON BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD – Supreme Court of United States

501 U.S. 190 (1991)LITTON FINANCIAL PRINTING DIVISION, A DIVISION OF LITTON BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC.v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ET AL.No. 90-285.Supreme Court of the United States.Argued March 20, 1991.Decided June 13, 1991.CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUITM. J. Diederich argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.Deputy Solicitor General Wallace [...]

By | February 10th, 2017|Business, Case Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Business Case Law The HERTZ CORP v. Melinda FRIEND – Supreme Court of United States

130 S.Ct. 1181 (2010)The HERTZ CORP., Petitioner,v.Melinda FRIEND et al.No. 08-1107.Supreme Court of United States.Argued November 10, 2009.Decided February 23, 2010.Sri Srinivasan, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.Todd M. Schneider, San Francisco, CA, for respondents.Frank B. Shuster, (Counsel of Record), Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLP, Atlanta, GA, Robert A. Dolinko, Chris Baker, Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco, [...]

By | February 9th, 2017|Business, Case Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Business Case Law Senior ARONSON v. Harry LEWIS – Delaware

473 A.2d 805 (1984)Senior ARONSON, et al., Defendants Below, Appellants,v.Harry LEWIS, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.Supreme Court of Delaware.Submitted: November 14, 1983.Decided: March 1, 1984.William T. Quillen (argued), Robert K. Payson, Peter M. Sieglaff, Potter, Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington; and Allan M. Pepper, Michael D. Braff, Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays & Handler, New York City, for appellants.Joseph [...]

By | February 9th, 2017|Business, Case Law, Delaware|0 Comments

Business Case Law HELICOPTEROS NACIONALES DE COLOMBIA, S. A. v. HALL – Supreme Court of United States

466 U.S. 408 (1984)HELICOPTEROS NACIONALES DE COLOMBIA, S. A.v.HALL ET AL.No. 82-1127.Supreme Court of United States.Argued November 8, 1983Decided April 24, 1984CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXASThomas J. Whalen argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Austin P. Magner, Cynthia J. Larsen, James E. Ingram, and Barry A. Chasnoff.George E. [...]

By | February 9th, 2017|Business, Case Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Business Case Law BURGER KING CORP v. RUDZEWICZ- Supreme Court of United States

471 U.S. 462 (1985)BURGER KING CORP.v.RUDZEWICZNo. 83-2097.Supreme Court of United States.Argued January 8, 1985Decided May 20, 1985APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Joel S. Perwin argued the cause and filed briefs for appellant.Thomas H. Oehmke argued the cause and filed a brief for appellee.JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of [...]

By | February 7th, 2017|Business, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Business Case Law BONNER v. CITY OF PRICHARD – Alabama

661 F.2d 1206 (1981)Larry BONNER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CITY OF PRICHARD, ALABAMA, et al., Defendants-Appellees.No. 81-7005.United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.November 3, 1981. Reams, Tappan, Wood, Vollmer, Phillips & Killion, P.C., Patricia K. Olney (Court-appointed), Mobile, Ala., for plaintiff-appellant.J. Randall Crane, Mobile, Ala., for defendants-appellees.Thomas R. McAlpine, Gen. Counsel, Ala. Dept. of Corrections, Montgomery, Ala., for amicus [...]

By | February 7th, 2017|Alabama, Business, Case Law|0 Comments