Employment Law

/Employment Law

Employment Law Case Law CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC. v. ADAMS – Supreme Court of United States

532 U.S. 105 (2001)CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC.v.ADAMSNo. 99-1379.United States Supreme Court.Argued November 6, 2000.Decided March 21, 2001.CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and O'Connor, Scalia, and Thomas, JJ., joined. Stevens, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in [...]

By | March 9th, 2017|Employment Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Employment Law Case Law WAGENSELLER v. SCOTTSDALE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL – Supreme Court of Arizona

147 Ariz. 370 (1985)710 P.2d 1025Catherine Sue WAGENSELLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.SCOTTSDALE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL; Donald A. Andrews and Jane Doe Andrews, his wife; Neal Brown and Jane Doe Brown, his wife; John W. Holmes and Jane Doe Holmes, his wife; and Kay Smith, a single person, Defendants-Appellees.No. 17646-PR.Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.June 17, 1985.Reconsideration Denied August 20, [...]

By | March 4th, 2017|Arizona, Employment Law|0 Comments

Employment Law Case Law MERS et al. v. DISPATCH PRINTING COMPANY et al. – Supreme Court of Ohio

19 Ohio St. 3d 100 (1985)MERS, APPELLANT,v.DISPATCH PRINTING COMPANY ET AL., APPELLEES.No. 84-1682.Supreme Court of Ohio.Decided August 9, 1985. Thomas M. Tyack & Assoc. Co., L.P.A., and Mark A. Serrott, for appellant.Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Mark S. Coco and Gary D. Begeman, for appellees.CELEBREZZE, C.J.The ultimate issue before us is whether the trial court [...]

By | March 4th, 2017|Employment Law, Ohio|0 Comments

Employment Law Case Law EMMA ROJO et al. v. ERWIN H. KLIGER et al. – Supreme Court of California

52 Cal.3d 65 (1990)801 P.2d 373276 Cal. Rptr. 130EMMA ROJO et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,v.ERWIN H. KLIGER et al., Defendants and Respondents.Docket No. S010142.Supreme Court of California.December 20, 1990.COUNSELPatten, Faith & Sandford and Lorraine Grindstaff for Plaintiffs and Appellants.Joseph Posner, David C. Anton, Margaret E. Roeckl, Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert & Matz, Robert J. Rose, [...]

By | March 4th, 2017|California, Employment Law|0 Comments

Employment Law Case Law McKINNEY v. PATE – United States Court of Appeals

20 F.3d 1550 (1994)Millard McKINNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.John PATE, individually and in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Osceola County Board of Commissioners, Jack Shannin, individually and in his official capacity as Development Department Director of Osceola County, and the Osceola County Board of Commissioners, collectively, Defendants-Appellees.No. 91-3416.United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.May 5, 1994.11 [...]

By | March 4th, 2017|Employment Law, United States Court of Appeals|0 Comments

Employment Law Case Law D. CHAPMAN v. AI TRANSPORT, et al. – United States Court of Appeals

229 F.3d 1012 (2000)John D. CHAPMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.AI TRANSPORT, et al., Defendants-Appellees.Nos. 97-8838, 97-9086 and 97-9269.United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.October 2, 2000.13 14 15 16 Teresa A. Ferrante, Lawyers Committee for Civil Right Under Law, Washington, DC, R. Lawrence Ashe, Jr., Nancy E. Rafuse, William B. Hill, Jr., Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, LLP, [...]

By | March 4th, 2017|Employment Law, United States Court of Appeals|0 Comments

Employment Law Case Law E. FEINGOLD v. STATE OF NEW YORK – United States Court of Appeals

366 F.3d 138 (2004)Larry E. FEINGOLD, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.The State of NEW YORK, the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, Leon Schulgasser, Kathleen A. Sullivan, Evelyn Waltrous, Sharon Lee-Sang, Fernando Tapia, Phyllis Isaacs, Other Administrative Law Judges and Employees, Defendants-Appellees.Docket No. 02-7985.United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.Argued: April 24, 2003.Decided: April 30, 2004. Allegra L. [...]

By | March 4th, 2017|Employment Law, United States Court of Appeals|0 Comments

Employment Law Case Law PRICE WATERHOUSE v. HOPKINS – Supreme Court of United States

490 U.S. 228 (1989)PRICE WATERHOUSEv.HOPKINSNo. 87-1167.Supreme Court of United States.Argued October 31, 1988Decided May 1, 1989CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Kathryn A. Oberly argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs were Paul M. Bator, Douglas A. Poe, Eldon Olson, and Ulric R. Sullivan.James [...]

By | March 4th, 2017|Employment Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Employment Law Case Law GRIGGS et al. v. DUKE POWER CO. – Supreme Court of United States

401 U.S. 424 (1971)GRIGGS ET AL.v.DUKE POWER CO.No. 124.Supreme Court of United States.Argued December 14, 1970Decided March 8, 1971CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were James M. Nabrit III, Norman C. Amaker, William L. Robinson, Conrad O. [...]

By | March 4th, 2017|Employment Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Employment Law Case Law NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. et al. v. DARDEN- Supreme Court of United States

503 U.S. 318 (1992)NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. et al.v.DARDENNo. 90-1802.United States Supreme Court.Argued January 21, 1992.Decided March 24, 1992.CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT Souter, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.George Robinson Ragsdale argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Gordon E. McCutchan, [...]

By | February 27th, 2017|Employment Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments