Hello! My name is Michael, and I'm an attorney ready to help! Your responses matter to me, so I only need a few minutes to review and respond to each of your posts.

Does your marital settlement agreement clearly state that the $200K buyout is in full and final satisfaction of all property and financial claims, and that he waives any future rights to the home or further compensation?

The language you included is headed in the right direction, but it could be stronger and more airtight. Right now, it's informal and leaves room for argument about what “not pursue any other financial assets” really covers.

Here is a stronger sample you can use:

“The parties agree that the Husband shall receive a one-time payment of $200,000 from the refinancing of the marital home, which shall constitute a full, final, and complete settlement of all claims the Husband may have against the Wife, including but not limited to claims for equitable distribution, spousal support, or any interest in the marital residence. The Husband expressly waives and relinquishes any and all current or future rights, title, or interest in the marital home and any other financial assets of the Wife. Both parties acknowledge that this Agreement is the result of a negotiated settlement, entered into freely, voluntarily, and with full understanding of its terms. The parties further waive any rights they may have under applicable state marital property laws to the extent permitted by law.”

If that’s the only language in the agreement, it likely doesn’t go far enough. You should add:

“The Husband further waives and releases any and all claims to the Wife’s retirement accounts, including but not limited to her 401(k), IRA, or pension plans, whether existing now or acquired in the future. He also waives any right to seek additional compensation or share in any future proceeds if the Wife sells or refinances the marital home after the date of this Agreement. This waiver is intended to be full and final, and shall survive the entry of any Judgment of Divorce.”

Yes, but it may be clearer if the section is renamed something broader like “Property and Financial Waiver” or “Settlement Terms.”

Just place the added language in its own paragraph so nothing is confusing.

Yes, it’s smart to include that in the agreement to avoid misunderstandings later. Even if you’re amicable now, clarity protects both of you.

Your alimony clause is clear. You may want to clarify that the $1K is child-related only, not spousal support, to prevent confusion.

Correct. You don’t need to file it unless it becomes part of a divorce. Signed + notarized = legally binding contract.

Any agreement can be contested, but a clear, voluntary, notarized agreement is usually upheld.

If he knowingly agreed, wasn’t pressured, and understood the value of the house, the judge is likely to uphold it. Courts honor voluntary settlements.